July 02, 2009

Manhattan Apartment Prices Drop

The expansive staff here at Running of the Bulls have been of the opinion that if the national residential housing market was not at the bottom, then it is closing in on one.

However, we have been at pains to note that even though the national data may be in the process of bottoming, the regional data bore wide disparities.  Florida and California, for example, were probably at a bottom.  Manhattan, however, was just at the beginning of their descent.

And now, the Manhattan descent has begun.

Manhattan apartment prices dropped for the first time since 2002 in the second quarter as the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Bear Stearns Cos. caught up to property owners in the nation’s most expensive urban market.

The median price fell 18.5 percent from a year earlier to $835,700, New York appraiser Miller Samuel Inc. and broker Prudential Douglas Elliman Real Estate said today. The number of sales plunged by half, the most since Miller Samuel began keeping data in 1989.

A significant decline in Manhattan is inevitable, in my humble opinion.  Bad for those living there, good for everyone else. The roadmap for the national/international housing collapse has its end when the last market standing falls. As every student of market history knows, in a severe bear market, the bear mauls everyone. Nobody is spared. 

For the bear market in housing to end, Manhattan apartment prices had to fall.  That is now happening. And unfortunately for those in New York, it still has some ways yet to go.

July 01, 2009

Correlations at All-Time Highs

According to Bloomberg

Investors are moving in lockstep like never before, driving up stocks, commodities and emerging markets and risking a replay of last year, when they all plunged the most since World War II.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, whose increase in the past three months was the steepest in seven decades, is rallying in tandem with benchmark measures for raw materials, developing-country equities and hedge funds. The so-called correlation coefficient that measures how closely markets rise and fall together has reached the highest levels ever, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Oceans of liquidity will do that.

June 16, 2009

Net Flat

I hedged out all my longs by putting on new shorts today.  I do not like the action of the market.  However, I am not looking for a tremendous break on the downside.

Now that I have gone net flat, it probably means stocks are going higher.

June 14, 2009

Yes, It Will End Badly. But in the Meantime...

... there is a lot of money yet to be made.  From Saturday's Wall Street Journal.

Liquidity

Worries are spreading that, like previous liquidity-driven market surges, this one could end badly, though many investors believe that won't happen soon.

Money supply in major countries, as measured by cash and checking accounts, has been rising sharply relative to gross domestic product, or total value of goods and services, Morgan Stanley reports. Money supply relative to GDP is at the highest level of any period covered by Morgan Stanley's data, which go back to the 1970s.

That measure of money supply has tended to move in line with bull and bear markets. It was declining in the late 1980s, ahead of the 1987 crash and the 1990 bear market. It started expanding in 1995, as a major bull market began. It started pulling back in March 2000, as the stock market fell. It then began expanding at the start of 2001, ahead of the next bull, only to top out again at the end of 2006, ahead of the next bear. Now it is surging again.

1100 on the S&P 500 anyone?

June 11, 2009

Barney Frank is a Jackass, but He is Correct. And What America can Learn from Sweden.

I caught the last snippet of Barney Frank's interview on CNBC this morning.  I wanted to track it down and watch the whole thing, so I went to the CNBC website and dug it up, which you can watch here.  I would highly suggest you watch it. 

Frank acts like a jackass at the end of the interview.  Mark Haines was asking legitimate questions, and Frank responds like a petulant, teenage Prima Donna and storms off.  However, he is absolutely bang on in his argument, and is correct when he says that shareholders should have increased power over corporate boards.

The United States has serious issues at the board levels of corporations.  Too often, boards are like clubs, with directors being too close to the CEO, who is often also the Chairman of the Board (another serious problem since no CEO should be the Chairman of the Board).  There is not enough independence amongst directors, nor is there enough independence amongst the compensation committee.

The best model for corporate governance in the world is in Sweden. In Sweden, shareholders have far more rights to oversee what management is doing with their money, including

  • The separation of the titles of Chairman and CEO
  • Mergers must be approved by shareholders
  • Shareholders of a certain size can call extraordinary meetings
  • The nomination committee to the board must have shareholder representation
  • It is much easier to remove management, CEOs and directors
  • Compensation is approved at the AGM
  • A plurality of votes, rather than a majority, is needed to pass resolutions and amendments.

Reforming board structure in America along the lines of governance structures in Sweden would go a long way towards eliminating the venality and agency/principal risk inherent in corporate America, which contributed to the debacle in the financial industry.

You are Probably Bad at Investing

No offense, but the average person cannot do this very well.  From Dalbar via World Beta.

Over the past 20 years investors in stock mutual funds have underperformed the S&P500 by 6.5% a year.  (8.35% vs. 1.37%.)  That return doesn’t even keep up with inflation.

They did even worse in bonds, underperforming the Barclay’s Aggregate by 6.7% a year.  (7.43% vs. 0.77%.)

This is because people want to do what makes them feel good, and what makes them feel good is to buy something that has gone up a lot.  People buy the hot mutual fund / stock / investment at the wrong time.  They chase the winners without understanding that there is cyclicality and reversion to the mean in investing. 

People should invest when they feel bad and stocks are getting hammered and out of favor, like buying stocks in March.  One can trade on momentum when one has a short-time horizon, but - with some exceptions - one should invest when stocks are cheap.


Junk Bond Spreads Fall

But are still historically very high.  From Bespoke.

Junk spreads 09 06

June 09, 2009

Articles and Commentary on This and That

The following are links to several articles I found interesting over the past week or so.

First, a comment on the market. 

I am still substantially net long but have not bought or sold anything over the past while. However, I am more of a seller than a buyer at these levels.

The trend is still up, though with the S&P 500 trading at about 14x normalized earnings of $68 a share, the market is more than fairly valued.  Economic and financial apocalypse is off the table but the economy still has structural problems such that earnings and equities returns will be capped for some time.

I believe that today's market most closely mirrors the latter half of the 1970s or the late-1930s to early-1940s when the market bounced hard off the bottom then meandered for several years.  We are currently in the bounce phase, and my playbook is for the S&P 500 to get over 1,000, but I am more than willing to change my mind if it appears the market is rolling over.  However, the market is showing no signs of turning, so the trend remains up.  It gets tricky when the uptrend ends.

I rely primarily on fundamental analysis when investing but I also use technical analysis as a tool for entry and exit points.  Paul Tudor Jones - perhaps the greatest hedge fund manager of all time - explains why technical analysis is important.

The inability to read a tape and spot trends is also why so many in the relative-value space who rely solely on fundamentals have been annihilated in the past decade.  ...

Today there are young men and women graduating from college who have a tremendous work ethic, but they get lost trying to understand the logic behind a whole variety of market moves. While I’m a staunch advocate of higher education, there is no training — classroom or otherwise — that can prepare for trading the last third of a move, whether it’s the end of a bull market or the end of a bear market. There’s typically no logic to it; irrationality reigns supreme, and no class can teach what to do during that brief, volatile reign. The only way to learn how to trade during that last, exquisite third of a move is to do it, or, more precisely, live it — a sort of baptism by fire. One has to experience both the elation and fear as markets move five and six standard deviations from conventional definitions of value.


The OECD believes the global economy is approaching a low.

Most of the world’s big economies are close to emerging from recession, according to data published on Monday by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development that pointed to a possible recovery by the end of the year.

The Paris-based organisation reported in its latest monthly analysis of forward-looking indicators that a “possible trough” had been reached in April in more developed countries that make up almost three quarters of the world’s gross domestic product.

The composite index for 30 economies rose 0.5 points in April, the second monthly rise in a row, after falling for the previous 21 months. The index seeks to identify turning points in the cycle about six months in advance.

The OECD said its overall measure of advanced member countries – ranging from the eurozone and the UK to the US, Mexico and Japan – now pointed to “recovery” instead of the “strong slowdown” they had been suffering since last August.

Good news!  Fewer and fewer Harvard grads are going into financial services.  Generally, tops are marked by more grads going into financial services and bottoms by less grads going to Wall Street.

The number of graduating Harvard seniors entering finance and consulting has fallen by half in the past year, the Harvard Crimson’s annual survey found. About one fifth of all seniors seeking full-time employment are taking jobs in one of the two sectors.

The number of seniors entering finance and consulting has fallen from 47% in 2007 to 39% in 2008 to 20% for the current Class of 2009. The financial sector saw the largest reduction, falling from 23% to 11.5%, while the share of seniors entering consulting fell from 16% to 8.5%.


Sam Zell says that commercial real estate is far from dead.

While it is true that there will be a few implosions, a housing style bust may not be in the offing. A simple reason may be the string of payments. Unlike a homeowner who loses their job then their home, the owner of CRE has a buffer. First the rents of the tenants pay the loans, and only when they are not enough to cover, do the owner then dip into their own pockets.

In short, the risk/payment responsibility is dispersed among several parties. Again, this is not to say that there will not be defaults, many of them or that REIT's will not suffer, it is just the widespread and pervasive losses we are seeing in RRE may not be in the cards (losses here are defined foreclosures on CRE).


Tobin's Q may be signaling a low in the market.

Tobins Q

Finally, hedge funds still have too much cash, which could power the market higher as lagging hedge fund managers put cash to work.

The fast money is proving slow to jump on the market's bandwagon.

Hedge net longs 09 06 Hedge funds, decried by many as quick traders, have played catch-up during the market rally since March. The average fund was 45% "net long" as of May 19, or had investment holdings valued at 45% more than its bearish "short" positions, according to Hedge Fund Research.

That figure is up from 33% earlier this year, but still is far below its 55% level a year ago. Funds are less bullish now than they were just before the market crumbled last fall.

Hedge-fund managers, and their investors, said many remain in a neutral position. Hedge funds tend to underperform stock-market averages at inflection points, in part because they aim to create a "hedged" performance, rather than ape the market.

May 31, 2009

The Yield Curve is Steep

When the yield curve is this steep, it is usually a good time to invest in stocks.

YieldCurve

Why?

Because a steep yield curve usually indicates an increase in future economic activity.

It may be that the steepness is a reflection of inflationary fears.  It may also simply be overwhelming supply.  Or, more likely, it is a combination of all three.

However, I would not bet against history.  A steep yield curve is good for the financial system, which can repair itself by feasting on risk-free fat long yields while paying their depositors nothing.  This re-liquefies the banks which can then start lending again, or at least cushion the blow from rising defaults.

For the record, I am less invested than I was a month ago but I still have significant equity exposure.

To Remind You Once Again, This is Not The Great Depression 2.0.

From Donald Marron via Greg Mankiw.

Not the Great Depression

Just to put everything in perspective.